Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573884›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Generating Virtual Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) Images from T1- and T2-Weighted Images Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network in Spine Imaging.

Johannes Haubold, Aydin Demircioglu, Jens Matthias Theysohn, Axel Wetter, Alexander Radbruch, Nils Dörner, Thomas Wilfried Schlosser, Cornelius Deuschl, Yan Li, Kai Nassenstein and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Johannes HauboldInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Aydin DemirciogluInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Jens Matthias TheysohnInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5869-7929
Axel WetterInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Alexander RadbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Nils DörnerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Thomas Wilfried SchlosserInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Cornelius DeuschlInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Yan LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3906-9481
Kai NassensteinInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Benedikt Michael SchaarschmidtInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Michael ForstingInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Lale UmutluInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Felix NensaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-7100

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FU 356/12-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences are frequently used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine. However, STIR sequences require a significant amount of scanning time. The purpose of the present study was to generate virtual STIR (vSTIR) images from non-contrast, non-fat-suppressed T1- and T2-weighted images using a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN). The training dataset comprised 612 studies from 514 patients, and the validation dataset comprised 141 studies from 133 patients. For validation, 100 original STIR and respective vSTIR series were presented to six senior radiologists (blinded for the STIR type) in independent A/B-testing sessions. Additionally, for 141 real or vSTIR sequences, the testers were required to produce a structured report of 15 different findings. In the A/B-test, most testers could not reliably identify the real STIR (mean error of tester 1-6: 41%; 44%; 58%; 48%; 39%; 45%). In the evaluation of the structured reports, vSTIR was equivalent to real STIR in 13 of 15 categories. In the category of the number of STIR hyperintense vertebral bodies (

Indexed as

computingmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmedical informaticsspine

Identifiers

PMID34573884
PMCPMC8467788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.