Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573621›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Learn to Train: Improving Training Data for a Neural Network to Detect Pecking Injuries in Turkeys.

Nina Volkmann, Johannes Brünger, Jenny Stracke, Claudius Zelenka, Reinhard Koch, Nicole Kemper, Birgit Spindler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina VolkmannInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Animal Behavior, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-9954
Johannes BrüngerDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5118-145X
Jenny StrackeInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Animal Behavior, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9986-9720
Claudius ZelenkaDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Reinhard KochDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4398-1569
Nicole KemperInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Animal Behavior, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0092-4302
Birgit SpindlerInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Animal Behavior, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8638-0718
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DE

Funding

Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Tierwohls in der Nutztierhaltung mbH Animal Welfare Innovation Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a camera-based system using artificial intelligence for automated detection of pecking injuries in turkeys. Videos were recorded and split into individual images for further processing. Using specifically developed software, the injuries visible on these images were marked by humans, and a neural network was trained with these annotations. Due to unacceptable agreement between the annotations of humans and the network, several work steps were initiated to improve the training data. First, a costly work step was used to create high-quality annotations (HQA) for which multiple observers evaluated already annotated injuries. Therefore, each labeled detection had to be validated by three observers before it was saved as "finished", and for each image, all detections had to be verified three times. Then, a network was trained with these HQA to assist observers in annotating more data. Finally, the benefit of the work step generating HQA was tested, and it was shown that the value of the agreement between the annotations of humans and the network could be doubled. Although the system is not yet capable of ensuring adequate detection of pecking injuries, the study demonstrated the importance of such validation steps in order to obtain good training data.

Indexed as

animal welfareartificial intelligenceinjury detectionsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34573621
PMCPMC8469856
OpenAlexW3198166958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.