Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573617›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Insects as Novel Ruminant Feed and a Potential Mitigation Strategy for Methane Emissions.

Eslam Ahmed, Naoki Fukuma, Masaaki Hanada, Takehiro Nishida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Heliyon · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. FermentedJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Are insects a solution for feeding ruminants? Legislation, scientific evidence, and future challenges.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cricket Meal (Insects · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eslam AhmedGraduate School of Animal Husbandry, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro 080-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-7815
Naoki FukumaDepartment of Life and Food Sciences, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro 080-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7740-1297
Masaaki HanadaDepartment of Life and Food Sciences, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro 080-8555, Japan.
Takehiro NishidaDepartment of Life and Food Sciences, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro 080-8555, Japan.
Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine · JPSouth Valley University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is the first to evaluate the chemical composition and impacts of four different edible insects,

Indexed as

alternative protein sourcesfatty acidsinsectsmethanerumen fermentationsoybeansustainability

Identifiers

PMID34573617
PMCPMC8471967
OpenAlexW3198011915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.