Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573509›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

How to Start Up a National Wildlife Health Surveillance Programme.

Becki Lawson, Aleksija Neimanis, Antonio Lavazza, Jorge Ramón López-Olvera, Paul Tavernier, Charalambos Billinis, James Paul Duff, Daniel T Mladenov, Jolianne M Rijks, Sara Savić and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ectopic Pregnancy and T-Cell Lymphoma in a Eurasian Red Squirrel (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Diseases of Iberian ibex (European journal of wildlife research · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Wildlife Disease Monitoring: Methods and Perspectives.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 11 countries.

Becki LawsonInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1706-7140
Aleksija NeimanisDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7747-2290
Antonio LavazzaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, via Bianchi 7/9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7646-3592
Jorge Ramón López-OlveraWildlife Ecology & Health Group and Servei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge, Departament de Medicina i Cirugia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera dels Turons s/n, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Paul TavernierWILDPAD, Polbroek 17, 9520 St-Lievens-Houtem, Belgium.
Charalambos BillinisDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Trikalon-Str. 224, 43100 Karditsa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-9772
James Paul DuffAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Diseases of Wildlife Scheme, Penrith CA11 9RR, Cumbria, UK.
Daniel T MladenovKRKA Bulgaria EOOD, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Jolianne M RijksDutch Wildlife Health Centre (DWHC), Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1168-9734
Sara SavićScientific Veterinary Institute "Novi Sad", Rumenacki put 20, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Gudrun WibbeltLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Marie-Pierre Ryser-DegiorgisInstitute for Fish and Wildlife Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Postfach, Länggass-Str. 122, 3001 Bern, Switzerland.
Thijs KuikenDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5501-9049
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBDevelopment Agency of Karditsa · GRErasmus University Rotterdam · NLIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · ITLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research · DEScientific Veterinary Institute "Novi Sad" · RSSwedish Veterinary Agency · SEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Multipurpose Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveti Georgi" · BGUniversity of Bern · CHUtrecht University · NLZoological Society of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whilst multiple countries in Europe have wildlife health surveillance (WHS) programmes, they vary in scope. In many countries, coordinated general surveillance at a national scale is not conducted and the knowledge of wildlife health status in Europe remains limited. Learning lessons from countries with established systems may help others to effectively implement WHS schemes. In order to facilitate information exchange, the WHS Network of the European Wildlife Disease Association organised a workshop to both collate knowledge and experience from countries that had started or expanded WHS programmes and to translate this information into practical recommendations. Presentations were given by invited representatives of European countries with different WHS levels. Events that led to the start-up and fostered growth spurts of WHS were highlighted, including action plan creation, partnership formation, organisation restructuring and appraisal by external audit. Challenges to programme development, such as a lack of funding, data sharing, infrastructural provision and method harmonisation, were explored. Recommendations to help overcome key challenges were summarised as: understanding and awareness; cross-sectoral scope; national-scale collaboration; harmonisation of methods; government support; academic support; other funding support; staff expertise and capacity; leadership, feedback and engagement; and threat mitigation and wildlife disease management. This resource may enable the development of WHS programmes in Europe and beyond.

Indexed as

diseasegeneralhealthnetworkpartnershipscanningsurveillancetargetedwildlife

Identifiers

PMID34573509
PMCPMC8467383
OpenAlexW3198068062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.