Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573495›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

The Invasive Bank Vole (

Andrew McManus, Celia V Holland, Heikki Henttonen, Peter Stuart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The genome sequence ofWellcome open research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew McManusDepartment of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Munster Technological University, Clash, V92 CX88 Tralee, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-6009
Celia V HollandDepartment of Zoology, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, College Green, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0550-7287
Heikki HenttonenWildlife Ecology, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI 00790 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5674-3271
Peter StuartDepartment of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Munster Technological University, Clash, V92 CX88 Tralee, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-8849

Funding

Please refer to funding acknowledgments in manuscript Please refer to funding acknowledgments in manuscript
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary driver of the observed increase in emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) has been identified as human interaction with wildlife and this increase has emphasized knowledge gaps in wildlife pathogens dynamics. Wild rodent models have proven excellent for studying changes in parasite communities and have been a particular focus of eco-immunological research. Helminth species have been shown to be one of the factors regulating rodent abundance and indirectly affect disease burden through trade-offs between immune pathways. The

Indexed as

biological invasionemerging infectious diseasesparasite dynamics

Identifiers

PMID34573495
PMCPMC8464959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.