Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573412›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

The Role of

Ian Yannuzzi, Margaret A Butler, Joel Fernandez, Jeannine R LaRocque

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian YannuzziBiology Department, Georgetown College, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Margaret A ButlerGeorgetown University Medical Center, Department of Human Science, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Joel FernandezGeorgetown University Medical Center, Department of Human Science, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Jeannine R LaRocqueGeorgetown University Medical Center, Department of Human Science, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-9677
Georgetown University · US

Funding

Mitotic DNA double-strand break repair in Drosophila melanogasterR15GM129628 · NIGMS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LAROCQUE KAPPAS, JEANNINE · 2018 to 2018
$465k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM129628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a particularly genotoxic type of DNA damage that can result in chromosomal aberrations. Thus, proper repair of DSBs is essential to maintaining genome integrity. DSBs can be repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), where ends are processed before joining through ligation. Alternatively, DSBs can be repaired through homology-directed repair, either by homologous recombination (HR) or single-strand annealing (SSA). Both types of homology-directed repair are initiated by DNA end resection. In cultured human cells, the protein CtIP has been shown to play a role in DNA end resection through its interactions with CDK, BRCA1, DNA2, and the MRN complex. To elucidate the role of CtIP in a multicellular context, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was used to create a

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEndonucleasesFemaleHomologous RecombinationMaleNuclear ProteinsRecombinational DNA RepairCtIP protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEndonucleasesNuclear ProteinsCtIPdouble-strand break repairDrosophilaend resectionhomologous recombinationnon-homologous end-joiningsingle-strand annealing

Identifiers

PMID34573412
PMCPMC8468788
OpenAlexW3200439290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.