Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573322›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

Flavors of Non-Random Meiotic Segregation of Autosomes and Sex Chromosomes.

Filip Pajpach, Tianyu Wu, Linda Shearwin-Whyatt, Keith Jones, Frank Grützner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Remarkable chromosomes and karyotypes: A top 10 list.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Filip PajpachSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9357-2694
Tianyu WuDepartment of Central Laboratory, Clinical Laboratory, Jing'an District Centre Hospital of Shanghai and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Linda Shearwin-WhyattSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4504-6534
Keith JonesGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.
Frank GrütznerSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUFudan University · CNUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segregation of chromosomes is a multistep process occurring both at mitosis and meiosis to ensure that daughter cells receive a complete set of genetic information. Critical components in the chromosome segregation include centromeres, kinetochores, components of sister chromatid and homologous chromosomes cohesion, microtubule organizing centres, and spindles. Based on the cytological work in the grasshopper

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationAnimalsCentromereChromosomes, InsectChromosomes, MammalianChromosomes, PlantEvolution, MolecularFemaleHumansMaleMeiosisPlantsSex Chromosomesmeiotic drivenon-random segregationsex chromosome

Identifiers

PMID34573322
PMCPMC8471020
OpenAlexW3196716738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.