Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573244›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Neuronal Dynamics of Pain in Parkinson's Disease.

Kaoru Kinugawa, Tomoo Mano, Kazuma Sugie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaoru KinugawaDepartment of Neurology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara 634-8521, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-9312
Tomoo ManoDepartment of Neurology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara 634-8521, Japan.
Kazuma SugieDepartment of Neurology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara 634-8521, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0148-4687

Funding

KAKENHI 20K19453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is an important non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). It negatively impacts the quality of life. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying pain in PD remain to be elucidated. This study sought to use electroencephalographic (EEG) coherence analysis to compare neuronal synchronization in neuronal networks between patients with PD, with and without pain. Twenty-four patients with sporadic PD were evaluated for the presence of pain. Time-frequency and coherence analyses were performed on their EEG data. Whole-brain and regional coherence were calculated and compared between pain-positive and pain-negative patients. There was no significant difference in the whole-brain coherence between the pain-positive and pain-negative groups. However, temporal-temporal coherence differed significantly between the two groups (

Indexed as

electroencephalographyneuronal synchronizationpainParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID34573244
PMCPMC8468705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.