Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573208›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2021

Is mHealth a Useful Tool for Self-Assessment and Rehabilitation of People with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review.

Bruno Bonnechère, Aki Rintala, Annemie Spooren, Ilse Lamers, Peter Feys

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bruno BonnechèreREVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7729-4700
Aki RintalaFaculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, FI-15210 Lahti, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-4697
Annemie SpoorenREVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Ilse LamersREVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-4769
Peter FeysREVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5680-5495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of mobile technology and mobile Internet offers new possibilities in rehabilitation and clinical assessment in a longitudinal perspective for multiple sclerosis management. However, because the mobile health applications (mHealth) have only been developed recently, the level of evidence supporting the use of mHealth in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is currently unclear. Therefore, this review aims to list and describe the different mHealth available for rehabilitation and self-assessment of pwMS and to define the level of evidence supporting these interventions for functioning problems categorized within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). In total, 36 studies, performed with 22 different mHealth, were included in this review, 30 about rehabilitation and six for self-assessment, representing 3091 patients. For rehabilitation, most of the studies were focusing on cognitive function and fatigue. Concerning the efficacy, we found a small but significant effect of the use of mHealth for cognitive training (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 0.28 [0.12; 0.45]) and moderate effect for fatigue (SMD = 0.61 [0.47; 0.76]). mHealth is a promising tool in pwMS but more studies are needed to validate these solutions in the other ICF categories. More replications studies are also needed as most of the mHealth have only been assessed in one single study.

Indexed as

cognitionfatiguelongitudinal assessmentmHealthmultiple sclerosisrehabilitationtelemonitoringwalking

Identifiers

PMID34573208
PMCPMC8466296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.