Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573202›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Preliminary Evaluation of the Clinical Benefit of a Novel Visual Rehabilitation Program in Patients Implanted with Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses: A Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

David P Piñero, Ainhoa Molina-Martin, María L Ramón, José L Rincón, Cristian Fernández, Dolores de Fez, Juan F Arenillas, Luis Leal-Vega, María Begoña Coco-Martín, Miguel J Maldonado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Rehabilitation of amblyopia using a digital platform for visual training combined with patching in children: a prospective study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David P PiñeroGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1546-4807
Ainhoa Molina-MartinGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4854-3592
María L RamónDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vithas Medimar International Hospital, 03016 Alicante, Spain.
José L RincónDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vithas Medimar International Hospital, 03016 Alicante, Spain.
Cristian FernándezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vithas Medimar International Hospital, 03016 Alicante, Spain.
Dolores de FezGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4404-8236
Juan F ArenillasGroup of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7464-6101
Luis Leal-VegaGroup of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-413X
María Begoña Coco-MartínGroup of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain.
Miguel J MaldonadoGrupo de Cirugía Refractiva y Rehabilitación Visual, Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA), Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.

Funding

Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial EXP 00106153 / IDI-20180123Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España RYC-2016-20471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors of this study evaluated the potential benefit on visual performance of a novel 3 week visual rehabilitation program based on the use of Gabor patches in patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with the implantation of two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL). A total of 30 patients were randomly assigned to two groups: a study group (15 patients) that used a videogame based on Gabor patches and a placebo group (15 patients) that used a videogame without specific stimuli for improving visual performance. No statistically significant differences between groups were found in distance, intermediate, and near post-training visual acuity (

Indexed as

contrast sensitivityGabor patchesmultifocal IOLtrifocal diffractive IOLvisual rehabilitationvisual training

Identifiers

PMID34573202
PMCPMC8464827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.