Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34572982›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Alveolar Nitric Oxide as a Biomarker of COVID-19 Lung Sequelae: A Pivotal Study.

Paolo Cameli, Elena Bargagli, Laura Bergantini, Miriana d'Alessandro, Bruna Giugno, Francesco Gentili, Piersante Sestini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cut-off values of one-minute sit-to-stand test for determining physical performance in mild-post-COVID-19 individuals.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Utility of NO and HNitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo CameliRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Siena University Hospital, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8639-2882
Elena BargagliRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Siena University Hospital, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Laura BergantiniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Siena University Hospital, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-3223
Miriana d'AlessandroRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Siena University Hospital, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2368-5722
Bruna GiugnoRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Siena University Hospital, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Francesco GentiliUnit of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital Santa Maria alle Scotte, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Piersante SestiniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Siena University Hospital, 53100 Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · ITOspedale Santa Maria alle Scotte · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since SARS-CoV-2 emerged in 2019, strict monitoring of post-COVID-19 patients in order to ensure the early detection of sequelae and/or chronic organ damage that could been associated with the infection has been essential. Potential involvement of the NO pathway in the development of post-COVID-19 lung fibrotic alterations is feasible, since the majority of respiratory cells can produce NO, and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) represents a biomarker of airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential utility of multiple-flow FeNO parameters in a post-COVID-19 population and to compare it with other indicators of lung damage proposed in the literature. We enrolled 20 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, who underwent clinical, respiratory functional (including PFTs and FeNO) and radiological follow-up after discharge. Compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls, post-COVID-19 patients showed significantly higher FeNO 350 mL/s and CaNO levels. Moreover, among the parameters included in the follow-up, CaNO showed the best accuracy in indicating predominant fibrotic changes and GGO at CT scan. To our knowledge, this preliminary study has investigated for the first time multiple-flow FeNO parameters in a post-COVID-19 population. The evidence of increased CaNO values may imply the persistence of alveolar and bronchiolar inflammation and/or a mild impairment of the alveolar-capillary membrane in these patients.

Indexed as

biomarkersCOVID-19nitric oxideSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34572982
PMCPMC8471694
OpenAlexW3193966310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.