Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34572946›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Tumour-Derived Cell Lines and Their Potential for Therapy Prediction in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Sandra Wagner, Nicola T Beger, Stephanie Matschos, Antonia Szymanski, Randy Przybylla, Florian Bürtin, Friedrich Prall, Michael Linnebacher, Christina S Mullins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sandra WagnerMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Nicola T BegerMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Stephanie MatschosMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Antonia SzymanskiMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Randy PrzybyllaMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Florian BürtinMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Friedrich PrallInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Michael LinnebacherMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8054-1402
Christina S MullinsMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of General Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2296-2027

Funding

Bundesland Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Technologie-Beratungs-Institut MV TBI-V-1-241-VBW-084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remains poor. Patients and physicians are in need of individual therapies and precise response predictions. We investigated the predictive capacity of primary tumour material for treatment response of metastases. Mutational landscapes of primary tumours and corresponding metastases of 10 CRC patients were compared. Cell line characteristics and chemosensitivity were investigated pairwise for primary and metastatic tumours of four patients. PDX models of one patient were treated in vivo for proof of concept. Driver mutations did not differ between primaries and metastases, while the latter accumulated additional mutations. In vitro chemosensitivity testing revealed no differences for responses to 5-FU and oxaliplatin between primary and metastatic cell lines. However, irinotecan response differed significantly: the majority of metastases-derived cell lines was less sensitive to irinotecan than their matching primary counterpart. Therapy recommendations based on these findings were compared to clinical treatment response and mostly in line with the predicted outcome. Therefore, primary tumour cell models seem to be a good tool for drug response testing and conclusion drawing for later metastases. With further data from tumour-derived cell models, such predictions could improve clinical treatment decisions, both recommending likely effective therapeutic options while excluding ineffective treatments.

Indexed as

chemosensitivitycolorectal cancermatching cell line pairs of primaries and metastasesmetastasistherapy prediction

Identifiers

PMID34572946
PMCPMC8471446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.