Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34572883›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

The Evolution and Prognostic Role of Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Peripheral Blood-Based Biomarkers in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Christophe Van Berckelaer, Iris Vermeiren, Leonie Vercauteren, Charlotte Rypens, Gizem Oner, Xuan Bich Trinh, Wiebren A A Tjalma, Glenn Broeckx, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Steven Van Laere and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christophe Van BerckelaerTranslational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Iris VermeirenMultidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Unit Gynaecologic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
Leonie VercauterenMultidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Unit Gynaecologic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2650 Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5456-777X
Charlotte RypensTranslational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Gizem OnerMultidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Unit Gynaecologic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
Xuan Bich TrinhMultidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Unit Gynaecologic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
Wiebren A A TjalmaMultidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Unit Gynaecologic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2650 Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6618-045X
Glenn BroeckxCenter of Oncological Research (CORE), MIPRO, IPPON, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7543-8061
Emmanuelle Charafe-JauffretPredictive Oncology Team, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), INSERM, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 13273 Marseille, France.
Steven Van LaereCenter of Oncological Research (CORE), MIPRO, IPPON, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
François BertucciPredictive Oncology Team, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), INSERM, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 13273 Marseille, France.
Cecile ColpaertCenter of Oncological Research (CORE), MIPRO, IPPON, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Peter A van DamMultidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Unit Gynaecologic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2650 Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9184-7703
University of Antwerp · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) 1189617N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive form of breast cancer (BC) in which the (prognostic) role of stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) and the peripheral circulating immune cells in patients with residual disease (RD) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not clearly established. METHODOLOGY: To describe the evolution of sTIL and some peripheral inflammation markers (Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio) after NACT in IBC, we retrospectively collected clinicopathological variables for 125 stage III IBC patients. sTILs were scored by three different researchers on an H&E slide of the mastectomy specimen. A cohort of subtype-matched non-IBC breast cancer patients (nIBC) treated with NACT was included for comparison.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the pre- and posttreatment sTIL scores between IBC and nIBC and in both groups the number of sTIL was significantly lower after NACT. However, the IBC phenotype did correlate with a stronger decrease of sTIL after NACT (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.073-0.76,

conclusionsIBC is associated with a significantly stronger decrease of sTIL after NACT compared to nIBC. Furthermore, a high number of sTIL after NACT was associated with a worse prognosis in IBC.

Indexed as

immune responseinflammatory breast cancer (IBC)lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR)neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL)

Identifiers

PMID34572883
PMCPMC8471511
OpenAlexW3199329529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.