ReviewCancers2021
Targeted Therapies for the Evolving Molecular Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Crosstalk Between FOXN3 and E2F5 Reveals a Novel Tumor Suppressive Pathway in Acute Myeloid Leukemia via MAPK Signaling: Implications for Potential Future Targeted Therapy.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- SUMOylation inhibitor TAK-981 (subasumstat) synergizes with 5-azacytidine in preclinical models of acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2024Article
- Clinical guideline variability in the diagnosis of hereditary hematopoietic malignancy syndromes.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2023Article
- Clinical considerations at the intersection of hematopoietic cell transplantation and hereditary hematopoietic malignancy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Targeting UHRF1-SAP30-MXD4 axis for leukemia initiating cell eradication in myeloid leukemia.Cell research · 2022Article
- 2-Hydroxyglutarate in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Journey from Pathogenesis to Therapies.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Contemporary Approach to Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy in 2022.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2022Review
- Molecular Mechanism Investigation on Monomer Kaempferol of the Traditional Medicine Dingqing Tablet in Promoting Apoptosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia HL-60 Cells.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite considerable growth in our understanding of the heterogeneous biology and pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in recent decades, for nearly forty years, little progress was gained in the realm of novel therapeutics. Since 2017, however, nine agents have been FDA-approved for patients with AML in both the upfront and relapsed/refractory (R/R) settings. Most of these compounds function as inhibitors of key cell cycle enzymatic pathways or mediators of leukemic proliferation and survival. They have been approved both as single agents and in combination with conventional or reduced-intensity conventional chemotherapeutics. In this article, we review the molecular landscape of de novo vs. R/R AML and highlight the potential translational impact of defined molecular disease subsets. We also highlight several recent agents that have entered the therapeutic armamentarium and where they fit in the AML treatment landscape, with a focus on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.