Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34572859›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancers: What Is Practice Changing in 2021?

Hannah Christina Puhr, Matthias Preusser, Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Approach to Localized Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Role of sirtuins in esophageal cancer: Current status and future prospects.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah Christina PuhrDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias PreusserDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Aysegül Ilhan-MutluDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8291-0873
Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis of advanced esophageal cancer is dismal, and treatment options are limited. Since the first promising data on second-line treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in esophageal cancer patients were published, immunotherapy was surmised to change the face of modern cancer treatment. Recently, several studies have found this to be true, as the checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have achieved revolutionary response rates in advanced as well as resectable settings in esophageal cancer patients. Although the current results of large clinical trials promise high efficacy with tolerable toxicity, desirable survival rates, and sustained quality of life, some concerns remain. This review aims to summarize the novel clinical data on immunotherapeutic agents for esophageal cancer and provide a critical view of potential restrictions for the implementation of these therapies for unselected patient populations.

Indexed as

esophageal adenocarcinomaesophageal canceresophageal squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34572859
PMCPMC8472767
OpenAlexW3200615024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.