Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34572846›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Technical Challenges for CTC Implementation in Breast Cancer.

Rocío Ramos-Medina, Sara López-Tarruella, María Del Monte-Millán, Tatiana Massarrah, Miguel Martín

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Liquid biopsy-based early tumor and minimal residual disease detectionMedizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Recent Advances in Methods for Circulating Tumor Cell Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rocío Ramos-MedinaServicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon (IiSGM), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Sara López-TarruellaServicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon (IiSGM), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, 28007 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2606-9538
María Del Monte-MillánServicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon (IiSGM), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Tatiana MassarrahServicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon (IiSGM), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Miguel MartínServicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon (IiSGM), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, 28007 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9237-3231
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common neoplasm in women worldwide. Tissue biopsy, currently the gold standard to obtain tumor molecular information, is invasive and might be affected by tumor heterogeneity rendering it incapable to portray the complete dynamic picture by the absence of specific genetic changes during the evolution of the disease. In contrast, liquid biopsy can provide unique opportunities for real-time monitoring of disease progression, treatment response and for studying tumor heterogeneity combining the information of DNA that tumors spread in the blood (circulating tumor DNA) with CTCs analysis. In this review, we analyze the technical and biological challenges for isolation and characterization of circulating tumor cells from breast cancer patients. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration value is included in numerous clinical studies due to the prognostic's role of these cells. Despite this, there are so many questions pending to answer. How to manage lymphocytes background, how to distinguish the CTCs subtypes or how to work with frozen samples, are some of the issues that will discuss in this review. Based on our experience, we try to address these issues and other technical limitations that should be solved to optimize the standardization of protocols, sample extraction procedures, circulating-tumor material isolation (CTCs vs. ctDNA) and the very diverse methodologies employed, aiming to consolidate the use of CTCs in the clinic. Furthermore, we think that new approaches focusing on isolation CTCs in other body fluids such as cerebrospinal or ascitic fluid are necessary to increase the opportunities of circulating tumor cells in the practice clinic as well as to study the promising role of CTC clusters and their prognostic value in metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

body fluidsbreast cancerCTC clustersCTCsliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34572846
PMCPMC8466817
OpenAlexW3201178902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.