Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34572810›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Understanding MNPs Behaviour in Response to AMF in Biological Milieus and the Effects at the Cellular Level: Implications for a Rational Design That Drives Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy toward Clinical Implementation.

David Egea-Benavente, Jesús G Ovejero, María Del Puerto Morales, Domingo F Barber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Tunable Magnetic Heating in LaNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Egea-BenaventeDepartment of Immunology and Oncology, and NanoBiomedicine Initiative, Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia (CNB)-CSIC, Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Jesús G OvejeroDepartment of Energy, Environment and Health, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM)-CSIC, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 328049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3774-6589
María Del Puerto MoralesDepartment of Energy, Environment and Health, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM)-CSIC, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 328049 Madrid, Spain.
Domingo F BarberDepartment of Immunology and Oncology, and NanoBiomedicine Initiative, Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia (CNB)-CSIC, Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8824-5405

Funding

European Commission H2020-FETOPEN-RIA 829162Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación MAT2017-88148-RMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación PID-2020-112685RB-100Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PRE2018-084189Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RED2018-102626-TMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación SAF-2017-82223-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperthermia has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional cancer therapies and in fact, traditional hyperthermia is now commonly used in combination with chemotherapy or surgery during cancer treatment. Nevertheless, non-specific application of hyperthermia generates various undesirable side-effects, such that nano-magnetic hyperthermia has arisen a possible solution to this problem. This technique to induce hyperthermia is based on the intrinsic capacity of magnetic nanoparticles to accumulate in a given target area and to respond to alternating magnetic fields (AMFs) by releasing heat, based on different principles of physics. Unfortunately, the clinical implementation of nano-magnetic hyperthermia has not been fluid and few clinical trials have been carried out. In this review, we want to demonstrate the need for more systematic and basic research in this area, as many of the sub-cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with this approach remain unclear. As such, we shall consider here the biological effects that occur and why this theoretically well-designed nano-system fails in physiological conditions. Moreover, we will offer some guidelines that may help establish successful strategies through the rational design of magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia.

Indexed as

clinical trialhyperthermiamagnetic hyperthermiamagnetic nanoparticle-induced biological effectsmagnetic nanoparticlesnew therapies

Identifiers

PMID34572810
PMCPMC8465027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.