Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34572706›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Understanding Antibiotic Usage on Small-Scale Dairy Farms in the Indian States of Assam and Haryana Using a Mixed-Methods Approach-Outcomes and Challenges.

Naresh Kumar, Garima Sharma, Eithne Leahy, Bibek R Shome, Samiran Bandyopadhyay, Ram Pratim Deka, Rajeswari Shome, Tushar Kumar Dey, Johanna Frida Lindahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in bovine milk in India.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naresh KumarDairy Microbiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India.
Garima SharmaDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-0268-9927
Eithne LeahyDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Bibek R ShomeICAR-National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bangalore 560064, India.
Samiran BandyopadhyayICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Kolkata 700037, India.
Ram Pratim DekaDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-8120-224X
Rajeswari ShomeICAR-National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bangalore 560064, India.
Tushar Kumar DeyDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-9184-449X
Johanna Frida LindahlDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-1175-0398

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use and misuse of antibiotics in both humans and animals contributes to the global emergence of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria, a threat to public health and infection control. Currently, India is the world's leading milk producer but antibiotic usage within the dairy sector is poorly regulated. Little data exists reflecting how antibiotics are used on dairy farms, especially on small-scale dairy farms in India. To address this lack of data, a study was carried out on 491 small-scale dairy farms in two Indian states, Assam and Haryana, using a mixed method approach where farmers were interviewed, farms inspected for the presence of antibiotics and milk samples taken to determine antibiotic usage. Usage of antibiotics on farms appeared low only 10% (95% CI 8-13%) of farmers surveyed confirmed using antibiotics in their dairy herds during the last 12 months. Of the farms surveyed, only 8% (6-11%) had milk samples positive for antibiotic residues, namely from the novobiocin, macrolides, and sulphonamide classes of antibiotics. Of the farmers surveyed, only 2% (0.8-3%) had heard of the term "withdrawal period" and 53% (40-65%) failed to describe the term "antibiotic". While this study clearly highlights a lack of understanding of antibiotics among small-scale dairy farmers, a potential factor in the emergence of AMR bacteria, it also shows that antibiotic usage on these farms is low and that the possible role these farmers play in AMR emergence may be overestimated.

Indexed as

antibiotic usagefarmer misconceptionsfarm inspectionIndiaKAPresidues in milksmallholder dairy

Identifiers

PMID34572706
PMCPMC8468593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.