Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34572521›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2021

Effect of Strain Rate on Single Tau, Dimerized Tau and Tau-Microtubule Interface: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study.

Md Ishak Khan, Kathleen Gilpin, Fuad Hasan, Khandakar Abu Hasan Al Mahmud, Ashfaq Adnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Disrupting Amyloid Filaments of Tau by Means of Electric Fields.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Viscoelastic damage evaluation of the axon.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Ishak KhanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7680-9613
Kathleen GilpinAcademic Partnership and Engagement Experiment (APEX), Wright State Applied Research Corporation, Beavercreek, OH 45431, USA.
Fuad HasanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1889-4877
Khandakar Abu Hasan Al MahmudDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Ashfaq AdnanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubule-associated protein (MAP) tau is a cross-linking molecule that provides structural stability to axonal microtubules (MT). It is considered a potential biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia, and other neurological disorders. It is also a signature protein for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) assessment. In the case of TBI, extreme dynamic mechanical energies can be felt by the axonal cytoskeletal members. As such, fundamental understandings of the responses of single tau protein, polymerized tau protein, and tau-microtubule interfaces under high-rate mechanical forces are important. This study attempts to determine the high-strain rate mechanical behavior of single tau, dimerized tau, and tau-MT interface using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The results show that a single tau protein is a highly stretchable soft polymer. During deformation, first, it significantly unfolds against van der Waals and electrostatic bonds. Then it stretches against strong covalent bonds. We found that tau acts as a viscoelastic material, and its stiffness increases with the strain rate. The unfolding stiffness can be ~50-500 MPa, while pure stretching stiffness can be >2 GPa. The dimerized tau model exhibits similar behavior under similar strain rates, and tau sliding from another tau is not observed until it is stretched to >7 times of original length, depending on the strain rate. The tau-MT interface simulations show that very high strain and strain rates are required to separate tau from MT suggesting Tau-MT bonding is stronger than MT subunit bonding between themselves. The dimerized tau-MT interface simulations suggest that tau-tau bonding is stronger than tau-MT bonding. In summary, this study focuses on the structural response of individual cytoskeletal components, namely microtubule (MT) and tau protein. Furthermore, we consider not only the individual response of a component, but also their interaction with each other (such as tau with tau or tau with MT). This study will eventually pave the way to build a bottom-up multiscale brain model and analyze TBI more comprehensively.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProtein MultimerizationMicrotubulesProtein UnfoldingStress, Mechanicaltau Proteinstau Proteinsaxonal cytoskeletonhigh strain ratemolecular dynamicstau protein

Identifiers

PMID34572521
PMCPMC8472149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.