Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34571885›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Beyond Activation: Characterizing Microglial Functional Phenotypes.

Julia Lier, Wolfgang J Streit, Ingo Bechmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Synthetic Cyclic CAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neuroprotective effects ofBiomedical reports · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microglial polarization in retinal neovascularization: Friend or foe?Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia LierInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8454-9425
Wolfgang J StreitDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Ingo BechmannInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classically, the following three morphological states of microglia have been defined: ramified, amoeboid and phagocytic. While ramified cells were long regarded as "resting", amoeboid and phagocytic microglia were viewed as "activated". In aged human brains, a fourth, morphologically novel state has been described, i.e., dystrophic microglia, which are thought to be senescent cells. Since microglia are not replenished by blood-borne mononuclear cells under physiological circumstances, they seem to have an "expiration date" limiting their capacity to phagocytose and support neurons. Identifying factors that drive microglial aging may thus be helpful to delay the onset of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent progress in single-cell deep sequencing methods allowed for more refined differentiation and revealed regional-, age- and sex-dependent differences of the microglial population, and a growing number of studies demonstrate various expression profiles defining microglial subpopulations. Given the heterogeneity of pathologic states in the central nervous system, the need for accurately describing microglial morphology and expression patterns becomes increasingly important. Here, we review commonly used microglial markers and their fluctuations in expression in health and disease, with a focus on IBA1 low/negative microglia, which can be found in individuals with liver disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBrainCalcium-Binding ProteinsCD68 MoleculeHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansMembrane ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsMicrogliaNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurodegenerative DiseasesPhagocytesPhenotypeAIF1 protein, humanAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCalcium-Binding ProteinsCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIinvariant chainMembrane ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsP2RY12 protein, humanReceptors, Purinergic P2Y12Tmem119 protein, humanIBA1microglia

Identifiers

PMID34571885
PMCPMC8464670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.