Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34571819›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

Analysis of the Microbial Intestinal Tract in Broiler Chickens during the Rearing Period.

Alessandro Stamilla, Susana Ruiz-Ruiz, Alejandro Artacho, Javier Pons, Antonino Messina, Cinzia Lucia Randazzo, Cinzia Caggia, Massimiliano Lanza, Andrés Moya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation ofVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Effects ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro StamillaDipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-1501
Susana Ruiz-RuizFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), 46020 València, Spain.
Alejandro ArtachoFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), 46020 València, Spain.
Javier PonsFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), 46020 València, Spain.
Antonino MessinaDVM Consultant Poultry Specialists, 97015 Modica, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2507-559X
Cinzia Lucia RandazzoDipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Cinzia CaggiaDipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Massimiliano LanzaDipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1011-9924
Andrés MoyaFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), 46020 València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2867-1119
University of Catania · ITFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Conselleria de Cultura, Educación y Ciencia, Generalitat Valenciana Prometeo/2018/A/133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota contributes to animal health. However, identifying which microorganisms or associated functions are involved remains, still, difficult to assess. In the present study, the microbiota of healthy broiler chickens, under controlled diet and farm conditions, was investigated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing in four intestine segments and at four ages. In detail, 210 Ross-308 male chickens were raised according to the EU guidelines and fed on a commercial diet. The duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and caecum microbiota were analyzed at 11, 24, 35, and 46 days of life. Although the microbial composition was revealed as homogeneous 11 days after chicks hatched, it was found to be similar in the proximal intestine segments and different in ileum and caecum, where almost the same genera and species were detected with different relative abundances. Although changes during the later growth stage were revealed, each genus remained relatively unchanged.

Indexed as

16S rRNAgut microbiomeintestine segmentmicrobiotatime series

Identifiers

PMID34571819
PMCPMC8469170
OpenAlexW3201299621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.