ReviewBiology2021
Trends in Nanotechnology and Its Potentialities to Control Plant Pathogenic Fungi: A Review.
Review in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antifungal activity and defense response activation by Co- and Ni-doped ZnO nanoparticles against tomato root rot disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ultrastructural changes and defense strategy of yellow lupine during silver nanoparticle and Fusarium oxysporum interaction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nanopesticides by Design: A Review of Delivery Platforms, Environmental Fate, and Standards for Safe and Sustainable Crop Protection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-driven strategies to overcome azole resistance inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Bimetallic nanocomposite produced from Acacia tortilis subsp. raddiana for the mitigation fungal pathogens in tomatoes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Antimicrobial Potential of Cannabinoids: A Scoping Review of the Past 5 Years.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Silver nanoparticles coated with metabolites of Pseudomonas sp. N5.12 inhibit bacterial pathogens and fungal phytopathogens.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing postharvest food safety: the essential role of non-thermal technologies in combating fungal contamination and mycotoxins.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology for fungal pathogen control in crops: innovations, public health impacts, and disease prevention.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Nanoparticles: a promising tool against environmental stress in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Cytotoxicity, Release Behavior and Phytopathogens Control by Mancozeb-Loaded Guar Gum Nanoemulsions for Sustainable Agriculture.Journal of xenobiotics · 2023Article
- Bifunctional role of some biogenic nanoparticles in controlling wilt disease and promoting growth of common bean.AMB Express · 2023Article
- Nanofungicides with Selenium and Silicon Can Boost the Growth and Yield of Common Bean (Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Decrypting the multi-functional biological activators and inducers of defense responses against biotic stresses in plants.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Nanocapsules of ZnO Nanorods and Geraniol as a Novel Mean for the Effective Control ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification of circular RNAs expression pattern in caprine fetal fibroblast cells exposed to a chronic non-cytotoxic dose of graphene oxide-silver nanoparticle nanocomposites.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- The Never-Ending Presence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Antimicrobial Activity of Graphene-Based Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Applications for Human Welfare.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 15-18% of crops losses occur as a result of animal pests, while weeds and microbial diseases cause 34 and 16% losses, respectively. Fungal pathogens cause about 70-80% losses in yield. The present strategies for plant disease control depend transcendently on agrochemicals that cause negative effects on the environment and humans. Nanotechnology can help by reducing the negative impact of the fungicides, such as enhancing the solubility of low water-soluble fungicides, increasing the shelf-life, and reducing toxicity, in a sustainable and eco-friendly manner. Despite many advantages of the utilization of nanoparticles, very few nanoparticle-based products have so far been produced in commercial quantities for agricultural purposes. The shortage of commercial uses may be associated with many factors, for example, a lack of pest crop host systems usage and the insufficient number of field trials. In some areas, nanotechnology has been advanced, and the best way to be in touch with the advances in nanotechnology in agriculture is to understand the major aspect of the research and to address the scientific gaps in order to facilitate the development which can provide a rationale of different nanoproducts in commercial quantity. In this review, we, therefore, described the properties and synthesis of nanoparticles, their utilization for plant pathogenic fungal disease control (either in the form of (a) nanoparticles alone, that act as a protectant or (b) in the form of a nanocarrier for different fungicides), nano-formulations of agro-nanofungicides,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.