Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34571753›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

Unveiling Comparative Genomic Trajectories of Selection and Key Candidate Genes in Egg-Type Russian White and Meat-Type White Cornish Chickens.

Alexandra S Abdelmanova, Arsen V Dotsev, Michael N Romanov, Olga I Stanishevskaya, Elena A Gladyr, Andrey N Rodionov, Anastasia N Vetokh, Natalia A Volkova, Elena S Fedorova, Igor V Gusev and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandra S AbdelmanovaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Arsen V DotsevL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3418-2511
Michael N RomanovSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3584-4644
Olga I StanishevskayaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Elena A GladyrL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5210-8932
Andrey N RodionovL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Anastasia N VetokhL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2865-5960
Natalia A VolkovaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-3550
Elena S FedorovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Igor V GusevL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-3226
Gottfried BremInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Natalia A ZinovievaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4017-6863
Federal Scientific Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academician L.K. Ernst · RUAll-Russian Research Institute of Genetics and Farm Animal Breeding · RUUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council G19438/2Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 0445-2019-0024Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 14.W03.31.0013Russian Science Foundation 21-66-00007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparison of genomic footprints in chicken breeds with different selection history is a powerful tool in elucidating genomic regions that have been targeted by recent and more ancient selection. In the present work, we aimed at examining and comparing the trajectories of artificial selection in the genomes of the native egg-type Russian White (RW) and meat-type White Cornish (WC) breeds. Combining three different statistics (top 0.1% SNP by

Indexed as

candidate geneschickengene ontologygene richnessgenomic regionsRussian White breedselection signaturesSNPsWhite Cornish breed

Identifiers

PMID34571753
PMCPMC8469556
OpenAlexW3198531855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.