ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
Total or subtotal replacement of tarsal plate by novel silicone plate for upper eyelid reconstruction in malignant tumors.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose: To evaluate the cost, safety, surgical outcome, and efficacy of modified Cutler-Beard eyelid reconstruction utilizing a novel silicone plate as a tarsal plate replacement in the repair of 60% to 100% eyelid defects following the excision of large malignant tumors.
methods: A prospective, noncomparative, interventional study of 30 eyes was done over 3 years. Fourteen patients were female, and 16 patients were male. In all the cases, a silicone plate, the synthetic, artificial tarsal plate, was utilized for a total or subtotal replacement of the tarsal plate. The created defect was measured in mm (length and width) and later expressed in percentage. Pre- and postoperative action of levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) was measured. Pre- and postoperative measurements of the margin-to-margin reflex distance (MRD1) were noted.
results: Preoperative LPS action was 1.23 ± 1.35 mm, whereas postoperative LPS actions at the end of 1 week and 18 months were 11. 8 ± 0.88 mm and 13.53 ± 0. 73 mm, respectively. Preoperative MRD1 was - 3.0 ± 1.144 mm, whereas postoperative MRD1 values at the end of 1 week and 18 months were 2.18 ± 0.27 mm and 4.16 mm ± 0.35, respectively. The mean created defect after the removal of the tumor was 87.3% ±11.10. The mean length of the silicone plate implanted in this study was 27.53 ± 2.48 mm. The follow-up period for the study participants was 18 months.
conclusion: The synthetic novel silicone plate was successful as a tarsal plate replacement. A second surgical site for ear cartilage harvesting is avoided. Cadaver transfer of Achilles tendon carries the risk of transmission of communicable diseases, for example, hepatitis B and HIV. Silicone is an inert, nonreacting, and tissue-tested material, thus eliminating the possibility of graft rejection. This material is readily available and cost-effective. The novel silicone plate is considered to be the most promising alternative material as a tarsal replacement in the future generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.