ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
Multimodal imaging of eyes with metamorphopsia after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative demarcation lines in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: what en-face imaging reveals about visual outcomes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Impact of postoperative positioning on surgical and visual outcomes after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Retinal Displacement After Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Relationships of the Duration from Onset and Macular Morphology with Metamorphopsia After Surgery for Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Metamorphopsia after surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of post-operative foveal location and microstructural changes after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
- Prevalence and predictors of metamorphopsia after successful vitrectomy surgery for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.La Tunisie medicale · 2023Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the retinal features in eyes with postoperative metamorphopsia (POM) following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair using multimodal imaging (MMI).
methodsIn this cross-sectional; case-control study, patients after successful RRD repair following 25-gauge vitrectomy, clear vitreous cavity, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)>20/200 were categorized using Amsler chart: cases with POM and controls without POM. MMI was performed on swept-source platform (Triton, Topcon Inc) and the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope system (Spectralis HRA, Heidelberg). The measures assessed were CDVA, morphological features on optical coherence tomography, autofluorescence, and multicolor imaging (MCI).
resultsThirty-nine eyes were included in each group. Cases had greater number of eyes with total RRD (P = 0.029) preoperatively; abnormal foveal contour (P = 0.036), ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption (P < 0.001) and poorer postoperative CDVA (P = 0.046) as compared to controls. Outer retinal folds and retinal shift (unintentional translocation of retina after reattachment surgery for RRD) did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.48 and 0.35, respectively). On MCI, the distribution of detected ERM was similar between the groups (P = 0.25). Postoperative CDVA was significantly worse in eyes with POM.
conclusionPOM is affected by extent of RRD, postoperative foveal contour, and EZ status but not by retinal shift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.