Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34571619›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Identification of glaucoma from fundus images using deep learning techniques.

S Ajitha, John D Akkara, M V Judy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Topo-CNN: Retinal Image Analysis with Topological Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Artificial intelligence virtual assistants in primary eye care practice.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S AjithaDepartment of Computer Applications, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
John D AkkaraOphthalmology Department, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
M V JudyDepartment of Computer Applications, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlaucoma is one of the preeminent causes of incurable visual disability and blindness across the world due to elevated intraocular pressure within the eyes. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for preventing visual disability. Manual detection of glaucoma is a challenging task that needs expertise and years of experience.

methodsIn this paper, we suggest a powerful and accurate algorithm using a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the automatic diagnosis of glaucoma. In this work, 1113 fundus images consisting of 660 normal and 453 glaucomatous images from four databases have been used for the diagnosis of glaucoma. A 13-layer CNN is potently trained from this dataset to mine vital features, and these features are classified into either glaucomatous or normal class during testing. The proposed algorithm is implemented in Google Colab, which made the task straightforward without spending hours installing the environment and supporting libraries. To evaluate the effectiveness of our algorithm, the dataset is divided into 70% for training, 20% for validation, and the remaining 10% utilized for testing. The training images are augmented to 12012 fundus images.

resultsOur model with SoftMax classifier achieved an accuracy of 93.86%, sensitivity of 85.42%, specificity of 100%, and precision of 100%. In contrast, the model with the SVM classifier achieved accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision of 95.61, 89.58, 100, and 100%, respectively.

conclusionThese results demonstrate the ability of the deep learning model to identify glaucoma from fundus images and suggest that the proposed system can help ophthalmologists in a fast, accurate, and reliable diagnosis of glaucoma.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaAlgorithmsFundus OculiHumansNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networksdeep learningglaucomasupport-vector machine

Identifiers

PMID34571619
PMCPMC8597466
OpenAlexW3203886254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.