Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34571618›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Use of predictive models to identify patients who are likely to benefit from refraction at a follow-up visit after cataract surgery.

Sachin Gupta, Matthew J Schneider, S Ashok Vardhan, Thulasiraj Ravilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sachin GuptaSC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Matthew J SchneiderLeBow College of Business, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
S Ashok VardhanAravind Eye Hospital, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Thulasiraj RavillaLAICO, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop predictive models to identify cataract surgery patients who are more likely to benefit from refraction at a four-week postoperative exam.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we used data of all 86,776 cataract surgeries performed in 2015 at a large tertiary-care eye hospital in India. The outcome variable was a binary indicator of whether the difference between corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected visual acuity at the four-week postoperative exam was at least two lines on the Snellen chart. We examined the following statistical models: logistic regression, decision tree, pruned decision tree, random forest, weighted k-nearest neighbor, and a neural network. Predictor variables included in each model were patient sex and age, source eye (left or right), preoperative visual acuity, first-day postoperative visual acuity, intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications, and combined surgeries. We compared the predictive performance of models and assessed their clinical impact in test samples.

resultsAll models demonstrated predictive accuracy better than chance based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In a targeting exercise with a fixed intervention budget, we found that gains from predictive models in identifying patients who would benefit from refraction ranged from 7.8% (increase from 1500 to 1617 patients) to 74% (increase from 250 to 435 patients).

conclusionThe use of predictive statistical models to identify patients who are likely to benefit from refraction at follow-up can improve the economic efficiency of interventions. Simpler models like logistic regression perform almost as well as more complex machine-learning models, but are easier to implement.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionPhacoemulsificationFollow-Up StudiesHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesFollow upphacoemulsificationpredictive modelsrefractionsmall incision cataract surgery

Identifiers

PMID34571618
PMCPMC8597443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.