Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34571604›Full record

Observational studyIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Subjective and objective assessment of the eye drop instillation technique: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Ugam Usgaonkar, Viraj Zambaulicar, Aksha Shetty

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Alternatives to Topical Glaucoma Medication for Glaucoma Management.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ugam UsgaonkarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Goa Medical College and Hospital, Goa, India.
Viraj ZambaulicarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Goa Medical College and Hospital, Goa, India.
Aksha ShettyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Goa Medical College and Hospital, Goa, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo objectively and subjectively evaluate eye drop technique and assess communicated instructions, and reported problems with eye drop instillation among tertiary care sample eye drop users.

methodsA cross-sectional, observational study was carried out among patients attending our outpatient clinic from June to September 2020. Eligible participants obtained through convenient sampling were assessed for their eye drop instillation performance. The objective evaluation was made using observation of a demonstration and subjective assessment through responses to an interview. Patient inclusion criteria were being aged ≥18 years and using eye drops for ≥ one month; excluded if having a disability in communication or physical barriers in using eye drops. The patient reported difficulties and previous education about the instillation were also obtained.

resultsParticipants (n = 84) had a mean age of 50.3 ± 14.0 years. During the demonstration, almost everyone (86.9%) successfully instilled at least one drop in the eye. None of the participants exhibited a perfect drop technique. The most common deviations were failing to close the eye (60.7%), touching the bottle to the eye or eyelid (36.9% of patients), and multiple blinks after drop instillation without nasolacrimal occlusion (25.0%). Forty percent of patients reported ≥1 problem and only a small sample recalled having had education in the eye drop instillation technique.

conclusionMost participants failed to properly execute the eye drop technique. A proactive role of the prescribing practitioner to assess a patient's ability to instill eye drops correctly could be helpful.

Indexed as

HospitalsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsOphthalmic SolutionsClinical outcomeeye drop techniquepatient education

Identifiers

PMID34571604
PMCPMC8597474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.