Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34571534›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Representation of molecules for drug response prediction.

Xin An, Xi Chen, Daiyao Yi, Hongyang Li, Yuanfang Guan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Representation of Molecules by Sequences of Instructions.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin AnDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Xi ChenDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Daiyao YiDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Hongyang LiDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Yuanfang GuanDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8275-2852

Funding

Machine Learning for Drug Response PredictionR35GM133346 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Yuanfang Guan · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of machine learning and deep learning algorithms in the recent decade has spurred an outburst of their applications in many research fields. In the chemistry domain, machine learning has been widely used to aid in drug screening, drug toxicity prediction, quantitative structure-activity relationship prediction, anti-cancer synergy score prediction, etc. This review is dedicated to the application of machine learning in drug response prediction. Specifically, we focus on molecular representations, which is a crucial element to the success of drug response prediction and other chemistry-related prediction tasks. We introduce three types of commonly used molecular representation methods, together with their implementation and application examples. This review will serve as a brief introduction of the broad field of molecular representations.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansdrug response predictiongraph representationmachine learningmolecular fingerprintmolecular representation

Identifiers

PMID34571534
PMCPMC8769696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.