Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34571453›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2021

Towards a more inclusive and equitable developmental cognitive neuroscience.

Jazlyn Nketia, Dima Amso, Natalie Hiromi Brito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Social Determinants of Health, the developing brain, and risk and resilience for psychopathology.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prenatal Stress and Maternal Role in Neurodevelopment.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Capturing the Heterogeneity of Word Learners by Analyzing Persons.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Socioeconomic Status and Reading Development: Moving from "Deficit" to "Adaptation" in Neurobiological Models of Experience-Dependent Learning.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jazlyn NketiaDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, United States; Department of Psychology, Columbia University, United States. Electronic address: jazlyn_nketia@brown.edu.
Dima AmsoDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, United States.
Natalie Hiromi BritoDepartment of Applied Psychology, New York University, United States.

Funding

“Overlapping and Discrete Pathways Through Which Prenatal Isolation and Uncertainty Stress Impact Maternal Mental Health and Child NeurodevelopmentR01MH126468 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BRITO, NATALIE HIROMI, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2021 to 2024
$3.0M
Investigating neurobehavioral consequences of COVID-19 related stressors on maternal mental health and infant developmentR01MH125870 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BRITO, NATALIE HIROMI, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2021 to 2024
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125870NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain and cognitive development is a burgeoning area of scientific inquiry, with tremendous potential to better the lives of children. Large scale longitudinal neuroimaging studies offer opportunities for significant scientific advances in our understanding of developing brain structure and function. The proposed manuscript will focus on the scientific potential of the HEALthy Brain and Cognitive Development (HBCD) Study, highlighting what questions these data can and what they cannot answer about child development. Specifically, we caution against the misuse of these data for advancing de-contextualized and scientifically questionable narratives about the development of children from marginalized communities. We will focus on building and organizing a framework for interpreting HBCD data through the lens of sampling, cultural context, measurement, and developmental science theory. Our goal is to thoughtfully offer the scientific community opportunities to use the large scale and collaborative nature of HBCD to collectively revise practices in developmental science that to-date have not carefully considered their own role in perpetuating narratives that support systemic injustice.

Indexed as

Cognitive NeuroscienceBrainChildChild DevelopmentCognitionHumansNeuroimagingBiasBrainChild developmentCultural contextHBCDSocial justice

Identifiers

PMID34571453
PMCPMC8476647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.