ArticleActa biomaterialia2021
Evaluation of a self-fitting, shape memory polymer scaffold in a rabbit calvarial defect model.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- PCL/Chitosan/Bioglass Hybrid Composite Shape Memory Scaffolds With Accelerated Degradation and Enhanced Bioactivity.Macromolecular materials and engineering · 2026Article
- Article
- Osteoinductivity of Tunable Shape Memory Polymer-Bioglass Composite Scaffolds.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- Hybrid Chitosan/PCL Shape Memory Scaffolds with Potential for Bone Regeneration and Infection Resistance.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Biodegradable Polyesters: Approaches to Increase Degradation Rates for Biomedical Applications.ACS macro letters · 2025Review
- Bioactive, PDMS-containing shape memory composite scaffolds with accelerated degradation rates.Polymer · 2025Article
- An In Vivo Assessment of Different Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Tissue Types and Their Differentiation State on a Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold for Bone Regeneration.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2024Article
- Shape Memory Polymer Bioglass Composite Scaffolds Designed to Heal Complex Bone Defects.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Polycaprolactone-based shape memory foams as self-fitting vaginal stents.Acta biomaterialia · 2024Article
- Mechanically robust and personalized silk fibroin-magnesium composite scaffolds with water-responsive shape-memory for irregular bone regeneration.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Trends in bioactivity: inducing and detecting mineralization of regenerative polymeric scaffolds.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Generative design approach to combine architected Voronoi foams with porous collagen scaffolds to create a tunable composite biomaterial.Acta biomaterialia · 2023Article
- Phototherapy techniques for the management of musculoskeletal disorders: strategies and recent advances.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- The Current Status, Prospects, and Challenges of Shape Memory Polymers Application in Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2023Review
- Four-Dimensional Printing and Shape Memory Materials in Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Improved Bone Regeneration Using Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold in a Rabbit Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Self-fitting scaffolds prepared from biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone)-diacrylate (PCL-DA) have been developed for the treatment of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bone defects. As a thermoresponsive shape memory polymer (SMP), with the mere exposure to warm saline, these porous scaffolds achieve a conformal fit in defects. This behavior was expected to be advantageous to osseointegration and thus bone healing. Herein, for an initial assessment of their regenerative potential, a pilot in vivo study was performed using a rabbit calvarial defect model. Exogenous growth factors and cells were excluded from the scaffolds. Key scaffold material properties were confirmed to be maintained following gamma sterilization. To assess scaffold integration and neotissue infiltration along the defect perimeter, non-critically sized (d = 8 mm) bilateral calvarial defects were created in 12 New Zealand white rabbits. Bone formation was assessed at 4 and 16 weeks using histological analysis and micro-CT, comparing defects treated with an SMP scaffold (d = 9 mm x t = 1 or 2 mm) to untreated defects (i.e. defects able to heal without intervention). To further assess osseointegration, push-out tests were performed at 16 weeks and compared to defects treated with poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) discs (d = 8.5 mm x t = 2 mm). The results of this study confirmed that the SMP scaffolds were biocompatible and highly conducive to bone formation and ingrowth at the perimeter. Ultimately, this resulted in similar bone volume and surface area versus untreated defects and superior performance in push-out testing versus defects treated with PEEK discs. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Current treatments of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bone defects include biologic and synthetic grafts but they are limited in their ability to form good contact with adjacent tissue. A regenerative engineering approach using a biologic-free scaffold able to achieve conformal fitting represents a potential "off-the-shelf" surgical product to heal CMF bone defects. Having not yet been evaluated in vivo, this study provided the preliminary assessment of the bone healing potential of self-fitting PCL scaffolds using a rabbit calvarial defect model. The study was designed to assess scaffold biocompatibility as well as bone formation and ingrowth using histology, micro-CT, and biomechanical push-out tests. The favorable results provide a basis to pursue establishing self-fitting scaffolds as a treatment option for CMF defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.