Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34570827›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Photosynthetic performance of rocket (Eruca sativa. Mill.) grown under different regimes of light intensity, quality, and photoperiod.

Naif Ali Elmardy, Ahmed F Yousef, Kui Lin, Xiwen Zhang, Muhammad Moaaz Ali, Sobhi F Lamlom, Hazem M Kalaji, Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Yong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evaluation ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2024
    Article
  4. Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density Effects onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. LED omics in Rocket Salad (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naif Ali ElmardyCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Ahmed F YousefCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-5566
Kui LinCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiwen ZhangInstitute of Machine Learning and Intelligent Science, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, China.
Muhammad Moaaz AliCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3092-6328
Sobhi F LamlomPlant Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-5003-9275
Hazem M KalajiDepartment of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna KowalczykDepartment of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Yong XuInstitute of Machine Learning and Intelligent Science, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, much effort has been devoted to understanding the response of plants to various light sources, largely due to advances in industry light-emitting diodes (LEDs). In this study, the effect of different light modes on rocket (Eruca sativa. Mill.) photosynthetic performance and other physiological traits was evaluated using an orthogonal design based on a combination between light intensity, quality, and photoperiod factors. Some morphological and biochemical parameters and photosynthetic efficiency of the plants were analyzed. Plants grew in a closed chamber where three light intensities (160, 190, and 220 μmol m-2 s-1) provided by LEDs with a combination of different ratios of red, green, and blue (R:G:B- 7:0:3, 3:0:7, and 5:2:3) and three different photoperiods (light/dark -10/14 h, 12/12 h, and 14/10 h) were used and compared with white fluorescent light (control). This experimental setup allowed us to study the effect of 9 light modes (LM) compared to white light. The analyzes performed showed that the highest levels of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids occurred under LM4, LM3, and LM1, respectively. Chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement showed that the best effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry Y(II), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), and electron transport ratio (ETR) were obtained under LM2. The data showed that the application of R7:G0:B3 light mode with a shorter photoperiod than 14/10 h (light/dark), regardless of the light intensity used, resulted in a significant increase in growth as well as higher photosynthetic capacity of rocket plants. Since, a clear correlation between the studied traits under the applied light modes was not found, more features should be studied in future experiments.

Indexed as

PhotosynthesisBrassicaceaeCarotenoidsChlorophyllLightPhotoperiodCarotenoidsChlorophyll

Identifiers

PMID34570827
PMCPMC8476030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.