Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34570802›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Learning curve for the laparoscopy-guided kidney biopsy procedure in small corpses of dogs and pigs.

Suellen Rodrigues Maia, Pamela Almerinda Mendes, Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara Barros, Ilan Munhoz Ayer, Salvador Boccaletti Ramos, Alessandra Marieeli Vacari, Tiago Machado Carneiro Lucera, Vanessa Yurika Murakami, Leonardo Lamarca de Carvalho, Pedro Negri Bernardino and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Surgical Description of Laparoscopic OvumAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Suellen Rodrigues MaiaDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pamela Almerinda MendesVeterinary Medicine Graduate Student, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara BarrosDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ilan Munhoz AyerDepartment of Animal Science, UNA-Academic Center, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Salvador Boccaletti RamosHealth Promotion Graduate Program, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alessandra Marieeli VacariAnimal Science Graduate Program/Veterinary Teaching Hospital of University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tiago Machado Carneiro LuceraAnimal Science Graduate Program/Veterinary Teaching Hospital of University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa Yurika MurakamiAnimal Science Graduate Program/Veterinary Teaching Hospital of University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo Lamarca de CarvalhoAnimal Science Graduate Program/Veterinary Teaching Hospital of University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Negri BernardinoGlobal Study Program, University of California Davis (UC DAVIS), Davis, California, United States of America.
Fernanda Nastri GouvêaGraduate Program in Veterinary Science (PPGCV) / College of Veterinary Medicine (FAMEV), Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-2964
Sofia Borin-CrivellentiGraduate Program in Veterinary Science (PPGCV) / College of Veterinary Medicine (FAMEV), Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Leandro Zuccolotto CrivellentiGraduate Program in Veterinary Science (PPGCV) / College of Veterinary Medicine (FAMEV), Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade de Franca · BRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRUniversidade do Vale do Sapucaí · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of renal biopsy through laparoscopy is increasingly present both in human and veterinary medicine. However, both techniques require skill and training to make the operator capable to do it. The learning curve allows the quantitative and qualitative assessment of the number of attempts and minimum time for the surgical procedure. The objective included establish the learning curve for laparoscopy-guided kidney biopsy procedures in dog and pig corpses. Six dogs and six pigs corpses weighing less than 10 kg were used for this study. All corpses underwent kidney biopsy performed through laparoscopy. Twenty-four operators, two per animal, performed 20 renal biopsies each (10 for each kidney), with 480 collection-procedures in total. Duration and difficulty of the procedure and the biopsy sample quality were evaluated and statistical analysis was performed using a mixed regression model with a random effect of individuals and multivariate analysis of data. There were 91.5% of the samples that were adequate for evaluation. There was no significant difference in the number of glomeruli or cortex percentage considering the attempts in either species, demonstrating the operator's ability since first collection. Swine samples showed higher amounts of renal cortex than canine samples. The procedure duration was shorter as more attempts were performed in dogs and pigs. From the fourth repetition, the professional reached a plateau for the variable related to 'collection', and from the second, the professional presented uniform duration for 'sample storage'. Operators of the swine model acquired more agility than the dog ones. The variable 'difficulty' decreased as more repetitions were performed, reaching a plateau in the sixth attempt. Seven renal biopsies laparoscopy-guided are required for an operator to be considered 'capable' to perform the procedure in the referred species included. The learning curve for image-guided kidney biopsy procedures improves the implementation of this technique and benefits patients that undergo this procedure.

Indexed as

DogsSwineAnimalsBiopsyCadaverEducation, VeterinaryFemaleKidneyLaparoscopyLearning CurveMaleVeterinary Medicine

Identifiers

PMID34570802
PMCPMC8475998
OpenAlexW3203147621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.