Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34570777›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Schistosome infection in Senegal is associated with different spatial extents of risk and ecological drivers for Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni.

Isabel J Jones, Susanne H Sokolow, Andrew J Chamberlin, Andrea J Lund, Nicolas Jouanard, Lydie Bandagny, Raphaël Ndione, Simon Senghor, Anne-Marie Schacht, Gilles Riveau and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Seasonal distribution and cercarial shedding ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Freshwater snail-borne parasitic diseases in Africa.Tropical medicine and health · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Isabel J JonesHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5784-885X
Susanne H SokolowHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, United States of America.
Andrew J ChamberlinHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5657-8333
Andrea J LundEmmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0880-310X
Nicolas JouanardBiomedical Research Center EPLS, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Lydie BandagnyBiomedical Research Center EPLS, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Raphaël NdioneBiomedical Research Center EPLS, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Simon SenghorBiomedical Research Center EPLS, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Anne-Marie SchachtBiomedical Research Center EPLS, Saint-Louis, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0003-1928-2717
Gilles RiveauBiomedical Research Center EPLS, Saint-Louis, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-5876
Skylar R HopkinsNational Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8381-0601
Jason R RohrDepartment of Biological Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Justin V RemaisDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Kevin D LaffertyWestern Ecological Research Center, United States Geological Survey at Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Armand M KurisDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Chelsea L WoodSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-3139
Giulio De LeoHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, United States of America.

Funding

Effects of agricultural expansion and intensification on infectionsR01TW010286 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI REMAIS, JUSTIN V, ROHR, JASON ROBERT · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schistosome parasites infect more than 200 million people annually, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa, where people may be co-infected with more than one species of the parasite. Infection risk for any single species is determined, in part, by the distribution of its obligate intermediate host snail. As the World Health Organization reprioritizes snail control to reduce the global burden of schistosomiasis, there is renewed importance in knowing when and where to target those efforts, which could vary by schistosome species. This study estimates factors associated with schistosomiasis risk in 16 villages located in the Senegal River Basin, a region hyperendemic for Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni. We first analyzed the spatial distributions of the two schistosomes' intermediate host snails (Bulinus spp. and Biomphalaria pfeifferi, respectively) at village water access sites. Then, we separately evaluated the relationships between human S. haematobium and S. mansoni infections and (i) the area of remotely-sensed snail habitat across spatial extents ranging from 1 to 120 m from shorelines, and (ii) water access site size and shape characteristics. We compared the influence of snail habitat across spatial extents because, while snail sampling is traditionally done near shorelines, we hypothesized that snails further from shore also contribute to infection risk. We found that, controlling for demographic variables, human risk for S. haematobium infection was positively correlated with snail habitat when snail habitat was measured over a much greater radius from shore (45 m to 120 m) than usual. S. haematobium risk was also associated with large, open water access sites. However, S. mansoni infection risk was associated with small, sheltered water access sites, and was not positively correlated with snail habitat at any spatial sampling radius. Our findings highlight the need to consider different ecological and environmental factors driving the transmission of each schistosome species in co-endemic landscapes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimal DistributionAnimalsChildDisease ReservoirsEcosystemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRiversRural PopulationSchistosoma haematobiumSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis haematobia

Identifiers

PMID34570777
PMCPMC8476036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.