Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34570677›Full record

ArticlePsychology & health2023

Feasibility of Systems Support Mapping to guide patient-driven health self-management in colorectal cancer survivors.

Stephanie J Sohl, Deanna Befus, Janet A Tooze, Beverly Levine, Shannon L Golden, Nicole Puccinelli-Ortega, Boris C Pasche, Kathryn E Weaver, Kristen Hassmiller Lich

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology & health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03520283 (Use of Systems Support Mapping to Guide Patient-Driven Self-Management in Rural and Urban Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03520283 nacompletednot on this map

Use of Systems Support Mapping to Guide Patient-Driven Self-Management in Rural and Urban Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2018 to 2020Enrolled24ConditionsCancer Survivor, Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8, Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8ArmsInterview, Questionnaire Administration, System Support Mapping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie J SohlWake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Deanna BefusArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Janet A ToozeWake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Beverly LevineWake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Shannon L GoldenWake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Nicole Puccinelli-OrtegaWake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Boris C PascheWake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Kathryn E WeaverWake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Kristen Hassmiller LichDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Wake Forest University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate feasibility of System Support Mapping (MAP), a systems thinking activity that involves creating a diagram of existing self-management activities (e.g. symptom management, health behaviors) to facilitate autonomous engagement in optimal self-management.

designOne-arm pilot study of MAP in colorectal cancer survivors (NCT03520283).

main outcome measuresFeasibility of recruitment and retention (primary outcome), acceptability, and outcome variability over time.

resultsWe enrolled 24 of 66 cancer survivors approached (36%) and 20 completed follow-up (83%). Key reasons for declining participation included: not interested (

conclusionsMAP feasibility in colorectal cancer survivors was mixed, predominantly because many patients did not perceive a need for this approach. MAP was acceptable among participants and showed promise for improving health outcomes.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsSelf-ManagementFeasibility StudiesHumansPilot ProjectsSurvivorsautonomyCancer survivorsdistressfatigueself-efficacyself-management

Identifiers

PMID34570677
PMCPMC8957632
OpenAlexW3204106540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.