ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2022
Children track probabilistic distributions of facial cues across individuals.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conceptual knowledge increasingly supports emotion understanding as perceptual contribution declines with age.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Statistical learning across cognitive and affective domains: a multidimensional review.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2025Review
- Category Flexibility in Emotion Learning.Affective science · 2023Article
- Context reconsidered: Complex signal ensembles, relational meaning, and population thinking in psychological science.The American psychologist · 2022Article
- A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Review
- The COVID-19 pandemic, mask-wearing, and emotion recognition during late-childhood.Social development (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Children track probabilistic distributions of facial cues across individuals.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children face a difficult task in learning how to reason about other people's emotions. How intensely facial configurations are displayed can vary not only according to what and how much emotion people are experiencing, but also across individuals based on differences in personality, gender, and culture. To navigate these sources of variability, children may use statistical information about other's facial cues to make interpretations about perceived emotions in others. We examined this possibility by testing children's ability to adjust to differences in the intensity of facial cues across different individuals. In the present study, children (6- to 10-year-olds) categorized the information communicated by facial configurations of emotion varying continuously from "calm" to "upset," with differences in the intensity of each actor's facial movements. We found that children's threshold for categorizing a facial configuration as "upset" shifted depending on the statistical information encountered about each of the different individuals. These results suggest that children are able to track individual differences in facial behavior and use these differences to flexibly update their interpretations of facial cues associated with emotion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.