Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34570334›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

The Attitudes of Brazilian Breast Surgeons on Axillary Management in Early Breast Cancer-10 Years after the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial First Publication.

Eduardo Camargo Millen, Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante, Felipe Zerwes, Guilherme Novita, Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza, João Henrique Penna Reis, Helio Rubens de Oliveira Filho, Luciana Naíra de B L Limongi, Barbara Pace Silva de Assis Carvalho, Adriana Magalhães de Oliveira Freitas and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer: too bold or the future?Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Eduardo Camargo MillenBreast Unit, Leblon Medical Center, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. eduardomillen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-6324
Francisco Pimentel CavalcanteBreast Unit, Fortaleza General Hospital (HGF), Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7156-2890
Felipe ZerwesSchool of Medicine, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-727X
Guilherme NovitaBreast Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, América Serviços Médicos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-3199
Alessandra Borba Anton de SouzaBreast Surgery Division, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6215-7076
João Henrique Penna ReisBreast Center, Instituto Orizonti and Hospital Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7754-9793
Helio Rubens de Oliveira FilhoSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-7047
Luciana Naíra de B L LimongiBreast Unit, Real Hospital Português, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-4793
Barbara Pace Silva de Assis CarvalhoBreast Unit, Pace Hospital, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1888-4433
Adriana Magalhães de Oliveira FreitasBreast Unit, Larmony Mastologia, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1068-4154
Monica Travassos JourdanBreast Unit, Samaritano Botafogo (Américas Serviços Médicos), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0910-0270
Vilmar Marques de OliveiraSchool of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Head of the Breast Unit, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9478-5616
Ruffo Freitas-JuniorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CORA Advanced Center for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-8598
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRBreast Center · CHFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRHospital Geral de Fortaleza · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital Samaritano de São Paulo · BRMater Dei Hospital · BRReal Hospital Português · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial on axillary breast cancer surgery management in Brazil following publication of that study (2010) and again in 2020. PATIENTS AND

methodsA survey of members of the Brazilian Society of Mastology.

resultsOf 1627 breast surgeons, 799 (49.1%) completed and returned the questionnaire. For patients with the Z11 inclusion criteria, following detection of a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN), axillary dissection (AD) was recommended by 99.2% of respondents before publication of the study, 47.5% in 2010 and 18.5% in 2020 (p < 0.001). In breast-conserving surgery, if there were micro-metastases, 2.6% would perform AD, 30.3% axillary radiotherapy, and 67.1% no additional axillary treatment, while with macro-metastases, these proportions were 21.3%, 52.2%, and 26.5%, respectively. In cases of mastectomy and of nodal extracapsular extension, 43.4% and 36% of surgeons, respectively, recommended AD. For clinically negative axilla and suspicious findings at ultrasonography, 69% of the surgeons would apply the Z11 approach. Most applied the Z11 criteria in cases of younger patients (83.6%) and triple-negative and/or HER2 positive tumors (74%). AD was significantly more likely to be recommended by surgeons who did not work in academic institutes, who worked in locations other than capital cities, who were not board-certified, and who were ≥ 50 years old.

conclusionsThis survey revealed substantial changes in axillary surgery management in cN0/pathologically positive SLN, particularly following publication of the updated Z11 results and other similar studies. A better education environment and long-term follow-up were factors associated with the incorporation of Z11-related changes in practice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSurgeonsAttitudeAxillaBrazilClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAxillary lymph node dissectionBreast conserving surgeryBreast neoplasmSentinel lymph nodes

Identifiers

PMID34570334
OpenAlexW3204467133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.