Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34570287›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2021

The ultrasound competency assessment tool for four-view cardiac POCUS.

Colin Bell, Natalie Wagner, Andrew Hall, Joseph Newbigging, Louise Rang, Conor McKaigney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Teaching point-of-care ultrasound in a rural family medicine residency.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Colin BellDepartment of Emergency Medicine & Cumming School of Medicine, Emergency Physician, Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, 7007 14th St. SW, Calgary, AB, T2V1P9, Canada. Colinbell85@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6416-8537
Natalie WagnerDepartment of Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, 74 Union St Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L3N6, Canada.
Andrew HallDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, 76 Stuart St Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L2V7, Canada.
Joseph NewbiggingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, 76 Stuart St Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L2V7, Canada.
Louise RangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, 76 Stuart St Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L2V7, Canada.
Conor McKaigneyDepartment of Emergency Medicine & Cumming School of Medicine, Emergency Physician, Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, 7007 14th St. SW, Calgary, AB, T2V1P9, Canada.

Funding

Organisation Canadienne des Physiciens Médicaux (CA) No.6023777University of Calgary Office of Medical and Health Education Scholarship ID 2016-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been recognized as an essential skill across medicine. However, a lack of reliable and streamlined POCUS assessment tools with demonstrated validity remains a significant barrier to widespread clinical integration. The ultrasound competency assessment tool (UCAT) was derived to be a simple, entrustment-based competency assessment tool applicable to multiple POCUS applications. When used to assess a FAST, the UCAT demonstrated high internal consistency and moderate-to-excellent inter-rater reliability. The objective of this study was to validate the UCAT for assessment of a four-view transthoracic cardiac POCUS.

resultsTwenty-two trainees performed a four-view transthoracic cardiac POCUS in a simulated environment while being assessed by two observers. When used to assess a four-view cardiac POCUS the UCAT retained its high internal consistency ([Formula: see text] and moderate-to-excellent inter-rater reliability (ICCs = 0.61-0.91; p's ≤ 0.01) across all domains. The regression analysis suggestion that level of training, previous number of focused cardiac ultrasound, previous number of total scans, self-rated entrustment, and intent to pursue certification statistically significantly predicted UCAT entrustment scores [F (5,16) = 4.06, p = 0.01; R

conclusionThis study confirms the UCAT is a valid assessment tool for four-view transthoracic cardiac POCUS. The findings from this work and previous studies on the UCAT demonstrate the utility and flexibility of the UCAT tool across multiple POCUS applications and present a promising way forward for POCUS competency assessment.

Indexed as

AssessmentCardiac ultrasoundCompetency-based medical educationFocused echocardiographyMedical educationPOCUS

Identifiers

PMID34570287
PMCPMC8476706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.