ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2022
Learning of flexible endoscopy, particularly endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT).
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic negative pressure therapy as a salvage treatment for management of post-surgical anastomotic leaks without ostomy after colorectal resection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Endoscopic vacuum therapy for gastrointestinal transmural defects: a literature review.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic insufficiency and perforations in the gastrointestinal tract are severe complications associated with a high complication rate and mortality. Conventional treatment options (particularly re-operations) are often unsatisfactory. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is increasingly being used as a promising alternative. PROBLEM: The use of EVT requires a high level of competence in interventional flexible endoscopy, which is primarily not available to every surgeon. Special training programs are required here.
methodsBased on this need the long-proven Tuebingen training system for flexible endoscopy was modified to meet the special requirements of surgeons and is currently being extended by a special training module for EVT.
resultsIn addition to the theoretical principles, the training is focused on learning the manual skills for flexible endoscopy. A 2-stage process was developed for this purpose: 1) to become familiar with handling of the flexible endoscope and to learn spatial orientation by means of a didactically optimized abstract phantom ("Tuebingen Orientophant") and 2) learning and training of EVT using a newly developed patient-analogous training model with various insufficiencies and abscess cavities in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract ("Tuebinger Spongiophant"). The procedure can be trained hands-on step by step exactly as with the patient, whereby the sponge can be applied using different methods, such as overtube and dragging procedures. The consequences of mistakes and complication management can also ideally be trained hands-on using the phantom. DISCUSSION: Evaluations of the first course series show that surgeons achieve endoscopic competence very quickly and learn to master the new procedure. The structure of such a course must, however, be designed according to long-term experience in an optimal didactic manner. Decision-makers in healthcare policy should give much more support to such courses in order to improve patient care and to increase patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34570261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.