Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34569893›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2021

Sustainable mitigation of heavy metals from effluents: Toxicity and fate with recent technological advancements.

Vivek Kumar Gaur, Poonam Sharma, Prachi Gaur, Sunita Varjani, Huu Hao Ngo, Wenshan Guo, Preeti Chaturvedi, Reeta Rani Singhania

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Toxics · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Harnessing the Potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Vivek Kumar GaurAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, India.
Poonam SharmaDepartment of Bioengineering, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Prachi GaurDepartment of Microbiology, Indian Institute of Management and Technology, Aligarh, India.
Sunita VarjaniParyavaran Bhavan, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat India.ORCID 0000-0001-6966-7768
Huu Hao NgoCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental, Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW - Australia.
Wenshan GuoCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental, Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW - Australia.
Preeti ChaturvediAquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Environmental Toxicology Group, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (Csir-iitr), Lucknow Uttar Pradesh, India.
Reeta Rani SinghaniaDepartment of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
University of Technology Sydney · AUAligarh Muslim University · INAmity University · AECentral Pollution Control Board · INIndian Institute of Chemical Biology · INIntegral University · INUniversity of Science and Technology · YE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increase in anthropogenic activities due to rapid industrialization had caused an elevation in heavy metal contamination of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. These pollutants have detrimental effects on human and environmental health. The majority of these pollutants are carcinogenic, neurotoxic, and are very poisonous even at very low concentrations. Contamination caused by heavy metals has become a global concern for which the traditional treatment approaches lack in providing a cost-effective and eco-friendly solution. Therefore, the use of microorganisms and plants to reduce the free available heavy metal present in the environment has become the most acceptable method by researchers. Also, in microbial- and phyto-remediation the redox reaction shifts the valence which makes these metals less toxic. In addition to this, the use of biochar as a remediation tool has provided a sustainable solution that needs further investigations toward its implementation on a larger scale. Enzymes secreted by microbes and whole microbial cell are considered an eco-efficient biocatalyst for mitigation of heavy metals from contaminated sites. To the best of our knowledge there is very less literature available covering remediation of heavy metals aspect along with the sensors used for detection of heavy metals. Systematic management should be implemented to overcome the technical and practical limitations in the use of these bioremediation techniques. The knowledge gaps have been identified in terms of its limitation and possible future directions have been discussed.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalEnvironmental PollutantsMetals, HeavySustainable DevelopmentBacteriaCharcoalbiocharCharcoalEnvironmental PollutantsMetals, HeavybiocharbioremediationHeavy metalssensorssustainability

Identifiers

PMID34569893
PMCPMC8806687
OpenAlexW3203456946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.