Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34569677›Full record

ArticleNephrology (Carlton, Vic.)2022

An analysis of antibody responses and clinical sequalae of the Sinopharm HB02 COVID19 vaccine in dialysis patients in the United Arab Emirates.

Stephen Geoffrey Holt, Sally Mahmoud, Wasim Ahmed, Juan Manuel Acuna, Ayman Kamal Al Madani, Islam Eltantawy, Walid Abbas Zaher, Gareth John Goodier, Nawal Ahmed Al Kaabi, Ali Abdulkareem Al Obaidli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen Geoffrey HoltSEHA Kidney Care, SEHA-Abu Dhabi Health Services Company, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5004-5539
Sally MahmoudG42, Group 42, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Wasim AhmedSEHA Kidney Care, SEHA-Abu Dhabi Health Services Company, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Juan Manuel AcunaSEHA Kidney Care, SEHA-Abu Dhabi Health Services Company, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Ayman Kamal Al MadaniSEHA Kidney Care, SEHA-Abu Dhabi Health Services Company, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Islam EltantawyG42, Group 42, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Walid Abbas ZaherG42, Group 42, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Gareth John GoodierAbu Dhabi Health Services Company, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Nawal Ahmed Al KaabiSheikh Khalifa Medical City, SEHA-Abu Dhabi Health Services Company, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Ali Abdulkareem Al ObaidliSEHA Kidney Care, SEHA-Abu Dhabi Health Services Company, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Abu Dhabi Health Services · AEAbu Dhabi University · AEKhalifa University of Science and Technology · AEShaikh Khalifa Medical City · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo establish the responses to the Sinopharm HB02 COVID-19 vaccination in the dialysis population, which are not well established. We examined the humoral responses to the Sinopharm COVID vaccine in haemodialysis patients.

methodsStandard vaccinations (two doses at interval of ~21 days) were given to all consenting haemodialysis patients on dialysis (n = 1296). We measured the antibody responses at 14-21 days after the second vaccine to define the development of anti-spike antibodies >15 AU/ml after vaccination and observed the clinical effects of vaccination.

resultsVaccination was very well tolerated with few side-effects. In those who consented to antibody measurements, (n = 446) baseline sampling showed 77 had positive antibodies, yet received full vaccination without any apparent adverse events. Positive anti-spike antibodies developed in 50% of the 270 baseline negative patients who had full sampling, compared with 78.1% in the general population. COVID infection continues to occur in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, but in the whole group vaccination appears to have been associated with a reduction in the case fatality rate.

conclusionThe humoral immune responses to standard HB02 vaccination schedules are attenuated in a haemodialysis cohort, but likely the vaccine saves lives. We suggest that an enhanced HB02 vaccination course or antibody checking may be prudent to protect this vulnerable group of patients. We suggest a booster dose of this vaccine at 3 months should be given to all dialysis patients, on the grounds that it is well tolerated even in those with good antibody levels and there may be a survival advantage.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeUnited Arab EmiratesVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines, InactivatedCOVID-19haemodialysisSinopharmvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34569677
PMCPMC8646272
OpenAlexW3204049854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.