Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34569307›Full record

ReviewChronic illness2022

A narrative review of the late effects of paediatric cancer treatment within an educational setting: Existing evidence and where do we go from here?

Jessica Iyamu, Jessica C Hodgson, Rachael Sharpe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chronic illness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica IyamuSchool of Education, 4547University of Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0766-3117
Jessica C HodgsonLincoln Medical School, 4547University of Lincoln, UK.
Rachael SharpeSchool of Education, 4547University of Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8687-8380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe late effects of paediatric cancer treatment within an educational context are an area that is relatively under researched within the United Kingdom.

methodsTo support this narrative review, systematic searches were conducted in key scientific databases between May and December 2020.

resultsUpon reviewing literature within this field, there are key considerations that should be addressed to provide clear and concise findings. These key considerations include clarification on whether the research undertaken focuses on the late or long term effects of paediatric cancer treatment, taking a consistent approach to data analysis with the aim to improve the validity of the study findings, utilising a mixed methodology to gain further depth to the findings as well as increasing the number of studies that focus on a specific tumour type rather than numerous types to allow a detailed study to be undertaken into the potential late effects a treatment for a specific tumour may elicit. DISCUSSION: If these key considerations are taken into account when conducting further research within this field, it would enable consistent findings to be utilised in providing the optimum educational provision for survivors of paediatric cancer who remain within the education system.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsChildHumansPalliative CareUnited Kingdomeducationmental healthPaediatricsupportwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID34569307
PMCPMC9397389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.