ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Insights From the Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform Into the Mechanism of Survival Benefit From Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do Chest Compressions Benefit the Brain Beyond Restoring Circulation? ROSC-Mediated and ROSC-Independent Pathways of Bystander CPR After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Smartphone-activated volunteer responders and survival to discharge after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Victoria, 2018-23: an observational cohort study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Observational
- Combining Ventricular Fibrillation Features With Defibrillation Waveform Parameters Improves the Ability to Predict Shock Outcomes in a Rabbit Model of Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Real-time amplitude spectrum area estimation during chest compression from the ECG waveform using a 1D convolutional neural network.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The mechanism by which bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is unclear. We hypothesized that ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform measures, as surrogates of myocardial physiology, mediate the relationship between bystander CPR and survival. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult, bystander-witnessed patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with an initial rhythm of VF who were treated by a metropolitan emergency medical services system from 2005 to 2018. Patient, resuscitation, and outcome variables were extracted from emergency medical services and hospital records. A total of 3 VF waveform measures (amplitude spectrum area, peak frequency, and median peak amplitude) were computed from a 3-second ECG segment before the initial shock. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between bystander CPR and survival to hospital discharge adjusted for Utstein elements. Causal mediation analysis quantified the proportion of survival benefit that was mediated by each VF waveform measure. Of 1069 patients, survival to hospital discharge was significantly higher among the 814 patients who received bystander CPR than those who did not (0.52 versus 0.43, respectively;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.