ArticleMolecular systems biology2021
A highly multiplexed quantitative phosphosite assay for biology and preclinical studies.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Polyphenol Metabolites Spatiotemporally Reprogram Transcription Factors and Human Proteostasis: A Metabolite-Centric Framework.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- PatientProfiler: building patient-specific signaling models from proteogenomic data.Molecular systems biology · 2025Article
- Integrative analysis of lung adenocarcinoma across diverse ethnicities and exposures.Cancer cell · 2025Article
- The mitochondrial multi-omic response to exercise training across rat tissues.Cell metabolism · 2024Article
- Computational approaches to identify sites of phosphorylation.Proteomics · 2024Review
- A Multipathway Phosphopeptide Standard for Rapid Phosphoproteomics Assay Development.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023Article
- Article
- Targeted Quantification of Protein Phosphorylation and Its Contributions towards Mathematical Modeling of Signaling Pathways.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Quantitative Cell Proteomic Atlas: Pathway-Scale Targeted Mass Spectrometry for High-Resolution Functional Profiling of Cell Signaling.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
- Rapid and In-Depth Coverage of the (Phospho-)Proteome With Deep Libraries and Optimal Window Design for dia-PASEF.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2022Article
- A highly multiplexed quantitative phosphosite assay for biology and preclinical studies.Molecular systems biology · 2021Article
- An Introduction to Advanced Targeted Acquisition Methods.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable methods to quantify dynamic signaling changes across diverse pathways are needed to better understand the effects of disease and drug treatment in cells and tissues but are presently lacking. Here, we present SigPath, a targeted mass spectrometry (MS) assay that measures 284 phosphosites in 200 phosphoproteins of biological interest. SigPath probes a broad swath of signaling biology with high throughput and quantitative precision. We applied the assay to investigate changes in phospho-signaling in drug-treated cancer cell lines, breast cancer preclinical models, and human medulloblastoma tumors. In addition to validating previous findings, SigPath detected and quantified a large number of differentially regulated phosphosites newly associated with disease models and human tumors at baseline or with drug perturbation. Our results highlight the potential of SigPath to monitor phosphoproteomic signaling events and to nominate mechanistic hypotheses regarding oncogenesis, response, and resistance to therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.