Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568998›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2021

Machine Learning in Pain Medicine: An Up-To-Date Systematic Review.

Maria Matsangidou, Andreas Liampas, Melpo Pittara, Constantinos S Pattichi, Panagiotis Zis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Artificial intelligence and pain medicine education: Benefits and pitfalls for the medical trainee.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Article
  14. Emotional recognition technologies applied to health: review and challenges.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Pain Research and Treatment: Policy Implications.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria MatsangidouCYENS Centre of Excellence, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Andreas LiampasDepartment of Neurology, Nicosia New General Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Melpo PittaraBernoulli Institute for Mathematics Computer Science and Artificial Intelligent, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Constantinos S PattichiCYENS Centre of Excellence, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Panagiotis ZisMedical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. takiszis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-3092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain is the unpleasant sensation and emotional experience that leads to poor quality of life for millions of people worldwide. Considering the complexity in understanding the principles of pain and its significant impact on individuals and society, research focuses to deliver innovative pain relief methods and techniques. This review explores the clinical uses of machine learning (ML) for the diagnosis, classification, and management of pain.

methodsA systematic review of the current literature was conducted using the PubMed database library.

resultsTwenty-six papers related to pain and ML research were included. Most of the studies used ML for effectively classifying the patients' level of pain, followed by use of ML for the prediction of manifestation of pain and for pain management. A less common reason for performing ML analysis was for the diagnosis of pain. The different approaches are thoroughly discussed.

conclusionML is increasingly used in pain medicine and appears to be more effective compared to traditional statistical approaches in the diagnosis, classification, and management of pain.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine learningPainPain classificationPain diagnosisPain managementPain manifestationSupervised learningUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34568998
PMCPMC8586126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.