ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022
Neuroectodermal tumours of the sino-nasal tract: a clinicopathological study of 18 cases with a newly proposed revised classification and a brief review of literature.
Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Copine-4 Paraneoplastic Autoimmune Encephalitis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathologic Profile, Management and Outcome of Sinonasal Ameloblastoma-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimSino-nasal tract tumours constitute 3% of the head and neck malignancies. Among these tumours, neuroectodermal tumours are rare with histo-morphological and immunohistochemical overlap making them a challenge for the pathologist. We included Ewing's/PNET, olfactory neuroblastoma (OFN), mucosal malignant melanomas (MMM), Melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy (MNTI), small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC), and the newest entity Adamantinoma like Ewing's sarcoma (ALES) as part of the neuroectodermally derived tumours of the sino-nasal tract. The last three entities were added to the existing ones, which also has been emphasized in this paper. METHODS AND
resultsA comprehensive analysis was done on all neuroectodermally derived tumours from 2016 to 2020. A total of 18 cases were collected, which included OFN (10 cases), SNEC (2 cases), MMM (2 cases), Ewing's/PNET (2 cases), MNTI (1 case), and ALES (1 case). The most common presentation in NE tumours was nasal obstruction (80-100%). Except for OFN, all other tumours were confined to the nasal and paranasal sinuses. 4/10 cases of OFN showed orbital extension. Cervical lymph-node metastasis was seen in 50% of cases of SNEC and MMM groups. An array of relevant immune-histochemical markers were performed. The marker expression was very subtle among the groups. On follow-up, recurrence was seen in the OFN and MMM groups in 30 and 50%, respectively. Metastasis was seen in SNEC group (100%) and OFN group (10%).
conclusionAs sino-nasal neuroectodermal tumours pose a diagnostic challenge and have different therapies and are prognostically different, the pathologist must be aware of the subtle morphological, immunohistochemical clues which have been dealt with in-depth in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.