Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568941›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

Mapping the coverage, availability and uptake of External Quality Assessment programmes across One Health sectors in Asia.

Ondari D Mogeni, Freshwork Ayalew Abegaz, Jong-Hoon Kim, Hea Sun Joh, Vicky Gaedt Kastbjerg, Susanne Karlsmose Pedersen, Rene S Hendriksen, Marianne Holm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing: new horizons in microbiology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-ProducingInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ondari D MogeniEpidemiology, Public Health and Impact (EPIC) Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5133-3735
Freshwork Ayalew AbegazEpidemiology, Public Health and Impact (EPIC) Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong-Hoon KimEpidemiology, Public Health and Impact (EPIC) Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Hea Sun JohEpidemiology, Public Health and Impact (EPIC) Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Vicky Gaedt KastbjergNational Food Institute, WHO Collaborating Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Pathogens and Genomics and European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, FAO Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Susanne Karlsmose PedersenNational Food Institute, WHO Collaborating Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Pathogens and Genomics and European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, FAO Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Rene S HendriksenNational Food Institute, WHO Collaborating Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Pathogens and Genomics and European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, FAO Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Marianne HolmEpidemiology, Public Health and Impact (EPIC) Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEstablishing effective external quality assessment (EQA) programmes is an important element in ensuring the quality of, and building capacity for, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) laboratory surveillance.

objectivesTo understand the current coverage of, and challenges to participation in, EQAs in National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) across One Health (OH) sectors in Asia.

methodsCurrent EQA coverage was evaluated through desktop review, online surveys and interviews of both EQA participants and providers. EQA coverage was mapped and summarized by laboratory type and 'readiness' level and identified challenges evaluated qualitatively.

resultsOf the 31 identified NRLs [16 Human Health (HH) and 15 Animal/Food Safety laboratories (A/FS)], 14 HH and 7 A/FS laboratories currently participated in international EQA schemes and several participated in two or more different schemes. Seven laboratories were currently not participating in any EQA scheme and two of these (one HH and one A/FS) do not currently perform microbiology; six HH NRLs provided national EQAs. Of the eight surveyed international EQA providers, three were based in Asia and all offered varying programmes in terms of pathogens, frequency and support mechanisms for reporting and follow-up. Only one provider currently served laboratories across all OH sectors.

conclusionsThe current coverage of EQA programmes for AMR in Asia was heterogeneous across countries but especially across OH sectors. This updated overview of the coverage and challenges associated with participation in, and provision of, EQAs for AMR suggest the benefit and relevance of introducing one comprehensive and high-quality EQA programme across OH sectors in Asia.

Indexed as

One HealthAsiaHumansLaboratoriesQuality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID34568941
PMCPMC8730702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.