Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568888›Full record

ArticleBJS open2021

Perioperative optimization in complex abdominal wall hernias: Delphi consensus statement.

T N Grove, C Kontovounisios, A Montgomery, B T Heniford, A C J Windsor, O J Warren, AWR Europe Collaborative

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Complex abdomen: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Impact of glucagon-Like peptide-1 agonists in optimizing abdominal wall Reconstruction patients.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

T N GroveDepartment of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4735-8638
C KontovounisiosDepartment of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1828-1395
A MontgomeryDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital SUS, Malmö, Sweden.
B T HenifordGastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1864-6048
A C J WindsorHCA Healthcare, London, UK.
O J WarrenDepartment of Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
AWR Europe Collaborative
Informa Healthcare · GBSkåne University Hospital · SEChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBCarolinas Medical Center · USRoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of incisional hernia after major abdominal surgery via a midline laparotomy is 20-41 per cent with short-term follow-up, and over 50 per cent in those surviving an abdominal catastrophe. Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) requires complex operations, often involving mesh resection, management of scarred skin, fistula takedown, component separation or flap reconstruction. Patients tend to have more complex conditions, with multiple co-morbidities predisposing them to a vicious cycle of complications and, subsequently, hernia recurrence. Currently there appears to be variance in perioperative practice and minimal guidance globally. The aim of this Delphi consensus was to provide a clear benchmark of care for the preoperative assessment and perioperative optimization of patients undergoing AWR.

methodsThe Delphi method was used to achieve consensus from invited experts in the field of AWR. Thirty-two hernia surgeons from recognized hernia societies globally took part. The process included two rounds of anonymous web-based voting with response analysis and formal feedback, concluding with a live round of voting followed by discussion at an international conference. Consensus for a strong recommendation was achieved with 80 per cent agreement, and a weak recommendation with 75 per cent agreement.

resultsConsensus was obtained on 52 statements including surgical assessment, preoperative assessment, perioperative optimization, multidisciplinary team and decision-making, and quality-of-life assessment. Forty-six achieved over 80 per cent agreement; 14 statements achieved over 95 per cent agreement.

conclusionClear consensus recommendations from a global group of experts in the AWR field are presented in this study. These should be used as a baseline for surgeons and centres managing abdominal wall hernias and performing complex AWR.

Indexed as

Hernia, AbdominalIncisional HerniaConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansSurgical Flaps

Identifiers

PMID34568888
PMCPMC8473840
OpenAlexW3202859634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.