Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568876›Full record

ArticleTechTrends : for leaders in education & training2022

Investigating Students' Perceptions of Screencasting Style of Video Feedback in Online Courses.

Patrick R Lowenthal, Holly S Fiock, Dana L Shreaves, Eric S Belt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TechTrends : for leaders in education & training, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick R LowenthalBoise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9318-1909
Holly S FiockPurdue University, 100 N. University Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2195-4412
Dana L ShreavesPacific Lutheran University, 12180 Park Avenue S, Tacoma, WA 98447 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9972-9277
Eric S BeltUniversity of Maryland, 620 W. Lexington St, BaltimoreBaltimore, MD 21201 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1211-369X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback is an essential part of the learning process. Asynchronous online courses are marked by an abundance of text-based feedback. Yet, video feedback in asynchronous online courses is a nascent field of inquiry. This study investigated student perceptions of screencasting style of video feedback in online courses. During this course, students received video feedback from their instructor, and provided and received video feedback to their peers. A total of 84 graduate students completed an end-of-course survey between 2018 and 2020 that focused in part on student satisfaction and perceived learning with video feedback and overall perceptions of social presence. Results indicate students were satisfied with receiving video feedback, that video feedback contributed to their perceived learning, and that perceptions of social presence were comparable to previous research. Limitations and implications for practice are discussed.

Indexed as

FeedbackOnline learningScreencastsSocial presenceVideo feedback

Identifiers

PMID34568876
PMCPMC8454992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.