Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568816›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2021

Deep Learning of Histopathology Images at the Single Cell Level.

Kyubum Lee, John H Lockhart, Mengyu Xie, Ritu Chaudhary, Robbert J C Slebos, Elsa R Flores, Christine H Chung, Aik Choon Tan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrating Spatial Proteogenomics in Cancer Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Intelligence in Histopathology.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. APL bioengineering · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Computational solutions for spatial transcriptomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyubum LeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
John H LockhartDepartment of Molecular Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Mengyu XieDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Ritu ChaudharyDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Robbert J C SlebosDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Elsa R FloresDepartment of Molecular Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Christine H ChungDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Aik Choon TanDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USMolecular Oncology (United States) · US

Funding

Project 4P01CA250984 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI STEWART, PAUL ALLEN · 2021 to 2025
$10.1M
Integrated Program in Cancer and Data Science (ICADS)T32CA233399 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI William Douglas Cress, Elsa R Flores · 2019 to 2026
$1.7M
Decoding tobacco-related oral cancer ecosystem by integrative approachR01DE030508 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CHUNG, CHRISTINE H, TAN, AIK CHOON · 2021 to 2023
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA250984NCI NIH HHS T32 CA233399NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE030508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) encompasses many heterogeneous cell types that engage in extensive crosstalk among the cancer, immune, and stromal components. The spatial organization of these different cell types in TIME could be used as biomarkers for predicting drug responses, prognosis and metastasis. Recently, deep learning approaches have been widely used for digital histopathology images for cancer diagnoses and prognoses. Furthermore, some recent approaches have attempted to integrate spatial and molecular omics data to better characterize the TIME. In this review we focus on machine learning-based digital histopathology image analysis methods for characterizing tumor ecosystem. In this review, we will consider three different scales of histopathological analyses that machine learning can operate within: whole slide image (WSI)-level, region of interest (ROI)-level, and cell-level. We will systematically review the various machine learning methods in these three scales with a focus on cell-level analysis. We will provide a perspective of workflow on generating cell-level training data sets using immunohistochemistry markers to "weakly-label" the cell types. We will describe some common steps in the workflow of preparing the data, as well as some limitations of this approach. Finally, we will discuss future opportunities of integrating molecular omics data with digital histopathology images for characterizing tumor ecosystem.

Indexed as

cell type classificationdeep learninghistopathology image analysisimage data labelingtumor heterogeneitytumor immune microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34568816
PMCPMC8461055
OpenAlexW3200855726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.